Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anita Chanda

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:13, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Anita Chanda

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deletion requested by subject at OTRS:6880209 who feels she is not sufficiently notable. No opinion from me. Stifle (talk) 16:55, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete On the low side of borderline; I would probably have said delete whether or not she requested it. 'DGG (at NYPL) (talk) 17:29, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I favor deleting biographies of borderline notable people if formally requested through OTRS. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 19:07, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as not notable. Google and Google Books give nothing; the existing references aren't sufficient to establish notability as an artist. I think it's a bit odd that someone should have a personal website promoting their art[1] but object to having a Wikipedia article, but even disregarding her request, deletion is called for. --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:51, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Perhaps she's actually looked at our standards, realizes she doesn't yet meet them, and simply wants to do the right thing. Refreshing. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 15:35, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete notability not established. The fact that we can accommodate subject's request with deletion is just extra bonus in this case.--Staberinde (talk) 18:02, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- Any artist must exhibit to sell their work. For an artist of 60+ she seems to have achieved remarkably little. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:37, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DeleteClearly is not notable,but she has achieved something(above average achievement, definitely not little).Uncletomwood (talk) 14:29, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.